#8199
10:22 pm
18th August

WHAT A SHIT FILM.

I mean really, they try and be all awesome at the end with Samuel L. Jackon playing the perfect contrast to Bruce Wilis, since they're meant to be each others nemesis; but aren't they FORGETTING SOMETHING?

Sure, Jackson is evil and scheming and Willis is pure and good, while Jackson is glass and Willis is steel, but the most interesting part is that despite having one black and one white it is neither of them that possesses a VAGINA.

Truly this film is a symptom of the patriarchy at its worst: women are bit-parts and not important enough to fill the leading roles. Or perhaps the film makers were simply SCARED that a black, crippled WOMAN could play a major role. It is CERTAINLY NOT what they had intended for SOCIETY.

M.Night Shamanland has received high praise from a number of the typical bourgeoius sources, but this film's ending truly does display the poverty of his intellectual prowess. He had before him a chance to challenge the confining doctrines that dominate our phallocentric society, but opted against it. He must consider the patriarchy as 'Unbreakable' as his film's title. Can he EVER be FORGIVEN? From this feminist, I doubt it.

#8200
10:24 pm
18th August

lol feminazis

#8203
10:34 pm
18th August

DON'T MAKE ME TAKE YOUR BALLS, SON

#8220
12:11 am
19th August

wut

#8229
12:50 am
19th August

Sure, you mock now.

But just you listen. Just you wait. Just wait.

#8236
7:31 am
19th August

stuka?

#8267
4:08 pm
19th August

Get the fuck back in the kitchin bitch and make me a sammich

#8278
5:59 pm
19th August

someone seems to have forgotten that Bruse Willis is already a massive cunt

don't need vagoo when Bruce will do

#8513
4:56 am
27th August

#8278

I stand corrected.

#9061
9:40 pm
11th September

Fuck off, stuka

#9179
2:31 am
16th September

LOL, Stuka? I

#11339
9:57 am
27th September

BRUCE WILLIZ>?!>!>!>?>!=[U34129054UI;/?!?1?/!one??!?!